Campbell Pleads Guilty, Gets Probation UPDATED

In the latest chapter of a teacher’s relationship with a student at the Episcopal School of Dallas, John Nathan Campbell pleaded guilty to sexual assault of a child, a felony. He received 10 years of “community supervision” and will be a registered sex offender for life.

Campbell entered a signed confession of his relationship with Jane Doe, who was a 16-year-old student in his world history class at ESD. The other charge, improper student-educator relationship, was dropped.

After Campbell was sentenced, Jane made a statement.

“Today, I come here as a woman,” she said through tears. “Not the weak, innocent, and vulnerable girl that I was when you knew me.”

Campbell, 35, sat facing Jane and periodically clenched his jaw. Charla Aldous, who represented Jane and her family in the civil suit against the school, held her hand. Jane called Campbell “twisted” and “manipulative.”

“You left me here to explain your mess that you made and carried on for months, what a coward and a poor excuse for a man and a human being,” she said. “…I’ve had to suffer the ignorance and cruelty of many who don’t understand how your type of abuse worked.”

Jane, who is now in college, said she is “moving forward along the path God has made for [her],” and that she is not afraid.

“I’m proud of myself for coming forward and standing strong, even in the face of so much adversity,” she said. “Today, I’m the one who has the power.”

In September, Jane and her family won a $9.2 million settlement in civil court. ESD has vowed to appeal the verdict.

UPDATE 1:15 p.m.

When reached by phone, Campbell’s attorney Mark Nancarrow called the sentence, “a fair resolution.”

“Each [sexual assault] case is different,” he said. “This case had a lot of unique factors.”

One such factor, Nancarrow said, was that the victim had a lot of input on the sentencing. He said he didn’t believe Jane or her family had a strong desire for Campbell to go to prison.

“The main thing we were in agreement on was 10 years deferred adjudication,” Nancarrow said.

By Claire St. Amant Oct. 10, 2011 | 11:03 am | 52 Comments | Comments RSS
52 comments to "Campbell Pleads Guilty, Gets Probation UPDATED"
  1. Apples to Apples @ October 10, 2011 at 12:09 pm
    proves the family was more interested in the money than justice.

  2. SPORT @ October 10, 2011 at 12:46 pm
    The school should pay for victimizing the victim. Keep your heads in the sand ESD fools.

  3. Apples to Apples @ October 10, 2011 at 12:58 pm
    from DMN Sunday – Former Fairhill coach sentenced to 12 years for relationship with student

  4. GMOM @ October 10, 2011 at 1:33 pm
    Moving on….when is Chris Burrows trial? He committed a felony as well. Witness tampering, or will he still be retained by ESD and his name go on a list forever??? Karma!

  5. Nancy @ October 10, 2011 at 1:48 pm
    Apples to Apples, you are right. This has been about the money all along. Campbell was working to help the Does and the Does have worked to help him all for the money.
    Shameful.

  6. a lambert @ October 10, 2011 at 1:54 pm
    jane is a hero,,,i wish her and her family total and complete happiness, i particularly admire her apparent lack of need for vindication in accepting the ten years probabtion…..Campbell will have to be very very careful and have his life under scrutiny for TEN years..not an easy out at all….

  7. ESD trial follower @ October 10, 2011 at 2:13 pm
    apples…
    shame on you and your ilk.
    esd will certainly continue to be villified if that is indeed the mindset of its supporters.

    once the irs finishes with swann and his cohorts, there will be nothing left but the hollow anger and arrogance.

  8. Emma @ October 10, 2011 at 3:27 pm
    I thought when the civil verdict came out, Campbell was liable for 40% of the Does’ winnings. How will that work? Will the state garnish his wages for the rest of his life?

  9. Aunt @ October 10, 2011 at 3:43 pm
    A Lambert – so the family feels vindicated by going after the school – which was held not liable for any aspect of the relationship – but they are OK with not punishing the perpetrator? First Jane didn’t come forward she was caught with the teacher. As for being a hero — I’d say she was a victim — and I hope this has ended for her and that her parents don’t continue to put the story out there for money in exchange for her well being. If they truly feel Campbell is a predator – not sure how letting him loose without serving any time is brave or sends any sort of message. Nor do I understand why the family would exploit Jane Doe by participating in the D Magazine article. I had heard predictions that this would happen – that Campbell cooperated with Plaintiff’s counsel in exchange for a lighter sentence — and that appears to be the case. We will never know the truth because school’s hands are tied to some extent. Will be interesting to see how the appeal turns out -

  10. ESD trial follower @ October 10, 2011 at 3:54 pm
    unfortunately, it sounds as if the perpetrator was the only employee at ESD who finally came clean.

    the sexual predator has more of a conscience than the administrators?

    the whole ordeal sickens me.

  11. OHREALLY @ October 10, 2011 at 4:58 pm
    Wait my mind is blown. I have sat here and read the commentators of this blog say that Doe was a child and was taken advantage of by an adult. She was not the consenting age and he raped her for months and by law she was a victim. Now I am reading that the Does did not want him to go to jail? Not even for a day. After he manipulated not only this girl’s trust but an entire school community? But the school, with their own faults, who knew nothing about the actual action of her relationship with Campbell must pay over 10 million dollars because they had a poor reaction to the entire ordeal? I would have no problem if ESD had to pay money for their part in this situation, but to find out that the man who committed these acts is getting off with barely nothing? Absolutely disgusting. I don’t care if he apologizes until his face turns blue, he should pay for what he did. Ten years probation and being registered as a sex offender is bad but he can live a pretty normal life. Even if this had nothing to do with money, which I highly doubt, why would they let this guy continue to believe he can do whatever he wants without any repercussions? What type of message that does send? This is just twisted.

  12. avid follower @ October 10, 2011 at 5:22 pm
    well it did not take long for the jack booted, goose-stepping followers of ESD to come out of the woodwork once again. [REDACTED]

    give it a rest. give up, you lost.

  13. avid follower @ October 10, 2011 at 5:35 pm
    actually the sentence is not as easy as it sounds. as a registered sex offender, campbell will find it hard to find a place to live and almost impossible to find a good job. this man may be a slime ball, but by all accounts, he is well educated and very knowledgeable in his subject area. knowing that for the rest of his life, he cannot teach or use his skills again, is in itself a significant punishment. good for the does to understand that he has been punished enough.

    they are showing a much more “christian” attitude than some of the supporters of ESD have shown to them.

  14. EagleParent @ October 10, 2011 at 5:35 pm
    It was all about the money for the Doe family. If it was my daughter I would want him to hear the jail door close behind him. And seriously, Jane’s emotional speech was written by Aldous. I’ve known her since she was five. She was so coached!

  15. OHREALLY @ October 10, 2011 at 5:44 pm
    so @avid follower, you do not believe that Campbell should not serve a day in prison for what he did to Jane Doe? Do you think it is fair for him to only have to wait 10 years and have all charges against him dropped? How many people actually do the checks to find out who are sex offenders? In 10 years, Campbell gets his life back while Doe has to reconfigure her life. He was the one that committed the crime, didn’t he? I think your hate is causing you to miss what is going on here. Sure, ESD made their mistakes but they did not rape her for seven months. I have no problem with ESD paying for their mistakes in this ordeal, they should be held accountable to their actions. But why is it that Campbell does not have to be? Please let me know, I am looking for a legitimate answer here. I can not wrap my head around this at all. I am obviously a jack booted, goose-stepping ESD follower… so please enlighten me.

  16. Disgusted @ October 10, 2011 at 5:46 pm
    Shame on you EAGLE PARENT – get off your soapbox about this victim. You are giving our school an even more embarrassing reputation. Who cares and who knows who wrote her speech. If it was your daughter, I pray that you take actions just like the Doe’s did.

  17. OHREALLY @ October 10, 2011 at 5:58 pm
    Oh I posted my comment before I read your comment @Avid Reader but you raise points that I didn’t think about but I still stand by my points. I still feel like he is getting off too easy.

  18. Former ESD Mother @ October 10, 2011 at 9:05 pm
    I have been and will continue to be a supporter of Jane, however when I first saw the sentence for Campbell I felt it was somewhat lenient too. My thoughts on a possible explanation are:
    1. Being a convicted felon and registered sex offender for life would be hell on earth, especially for someone of Campbell’s background. I’ve never worked for a company that did not do an extensive background check, so good luck getting a meaningful job.
    2. It might be easier to sit in prison and have the state support me than to try and face reality and look for a job and a place to live. Remember if he goes to prison we all support him.
    3. Jane clearly at one time had feelings for Campbell (which he so aptly groomed in her) and she is no doubt working through the difficult task of coming to terms with that. Her feelings may well still be mixed up and I can see where it could be hard to say prison is the best choice. I do get that, twisted as it may be. She was groomed. It worked.
    4. It appears Campbell aided the plaintiffs by supplying damaging evidence against ESD. A bargain was struck. That happens all the time, even for far worse crimes like murder. I get that and would have done the same thing in her position.
    5. Campbell admitted guilt, no question. He did it.
    6. Campbell’s life is forever altered (as it should be), and his life will be very difficult to say the least. Jane’s life is forever altered, and she will struggle with mental health issues undoubtedly. And what of Swann/Royall/Mayo? I am not seeing how their lives have changed. They mishandled this situation so badly (and the jurors agreed) yet they are still employed, their lives go on. If the three of them would step down I believe justice would have been served for all.
    7. Regarding Jane being coached by Aldous in her remarks, she would have been a fool not to accept expert advice. That is why you hire a good attorney, and it makes complete sense.

  19. Former ESD Dad X2 @ October 10, 2011 at 10:17 pm
    @avid follower -well it did not take long for the jack booted, goose-stepping haters of ESD to come out of the woodwork once again.

    give it a rest. give up, you won.

    ROTFLMAO. Thanks for the comic relief!

  20. trial follower @ October 10, 2011 at 10:21 pm
    Aunt – It is my understanding that the Doe’s did not participate in the D Magazine article as you have stated. The article was written by Claire based upon information that was detailed in the courtroom proceedings.

  21. Reform-Seeking Parent @ October 10, 2011 at 10:31 pm
    I am an ESD parent. [REDACTED]

    ESD is a great school, and my kids have been very happy with it, as have my spouse and I. However, I do feel that a change in leadership is necessary to relieve the strain this trial has brought.

    Without an overhaul of the board (John Eagle et. al), the school will continue to stay in its current publicity rut.

  22. alex @ October 11, 2011 at 6:32 am
    That Campbell gets zero prison time tells us all we need to know about the money grab this was all about.

  23. Avid Reader @ October 11, 2011 at 7:46 am
    @OHREALLY, Please do not confuse my name with this newcomer who clearly has an amazing imagination to come up with a name so unique as Avid Follower.

  24. EagleParent @ October 11, 2011 at 7:51 am
    @disgusted- I have an opinion and you do too. I pay the same tuition you fo unless you are really just a professional blogger. It was all about the money. Hopefully, the Doe family will receive nothing. They did an injustice to a lot of young women by not giving Campbell a jail sentence. I wonder who his next victim will be.

  25. avid follower @ October 11, 2011 at 9:30 am
    actually I do not hate ESD. I have several friends who teach there, personally know about 50 students, socialize with several families from the school. they are not overly defending ESD, they are good people who go/send or work at what was once a well respected school.

    and during all of this, I have not heard one comment from any of them that would blame Jane Doe or defend what those at the top of the administration did to her.

    most just want this to end and for their lives and their school to get back to normal. they, like most here, find the name calling of the victim to be in bad taste.

    that will not stop those of you that see all of the actions of Jane Doe and her family to be only about the money or to see that somehow she was at fault for all of this.

    take all the shots you want at me, but at the end of the day, I and most others know who is in the wrong here.

  26. Former Student @ October 11, 2011 at 12:11 pm
    I personally don’t see how anyone can read this without starting to question the Doe’s motives. Campbell’s lawyer flat out said they didn’t seem to want Campbell to serve jail time…is that not weird to people? They made such a fuss about ESD’s wrongs and then try and protect the man who they called an abuser and groomer throughout the ESD trial from jail time. I honestly can’t believe that people on here are still getting mad at ESD supporters for saying that that is weird. That should be a clear red flag to people on either side that something is going on with the Does when they fought the school so hard and then protect the teacher from the more obvious and warranted possible punishments.

    It baffles me that people can still get mad at “ESD supporters” for pointing that out…maybe the school did something wrong and deserves to be punished, but why didn’t they want to punish the teacher to the full extent too? For those of you who said it was because they didn’t need vindication, it seems like they sure did need vindication from the school when they asked for $10 million..the whole thing is very off putting.

  27. Former Student @ October 11, 2011 at 12:22 pm
    Also, I thought the Dallas Morning News article from today (the 10th) shared a lot of interesting thoughts about the recent developments regarding Campbell’s sentence and the Doe family.

  28. Lisa @ October 11, 2011 at 1:04 pm
    The Does won. They exposed Burrows ( and ESD’s conspiracy to silence them) by using Campbell. They would have to go through another trial and more vilification. Their lawsuit was about money as all lawsuits are- so what? That’s how the system works. Campbell confessed and will be punished publically and privately for the rest of his life. He will not be able to be with his children unsupervised, and many other financial and social consequences. Personally I wish he got some time, but so be it. What consequences to date for Swann, Burrows, Mayo Et al? Zip. Zero.Nada. Stop whining ESD. ” it’s YOUR house”- time to clean it.

  29. Disgusted @ October 11, 2011 at 2:05 pm
    EAGLE PARENT – it hurts me to write that. Do you seriously believe that Jane and her family had anything to do with the sentencing? Get your facts straight and again quit embarrassing our community. It is poor judgment from folks like you that have torn down OUR HOUSE.

  30. Disgusted @ October 11, 2011 at 2:07 pm
    Read the news articles – THEY WERE DISAPPOINTED HE DID NOT GET JAIL TIME.

  31. avid follower @ October 11, 2011 at 2:08 pm
    maybe he apologized and accepted blame. something ESD is not wanting to do. that is why some are so against ESD. They continue to see no blame on their part.

  32. Eagle Parent @ October 11, 2011 at 3:16 pm
    @ Disgusted- From the Dallas Morning News- “Dallas County Assistant District Attorney Tammy Kemp said Campbell was offered deferred adjudication because that’s what the young woman’s family wanted. ” So you need to get your facts straight.

    I had a child in Jane Does’ class. I still have a child at ESD. It is OUR HOUSE.

    I have said this, but the Doe family has done a great injustice in letting him get deferred adjudication. WHO WILL HIS NEXT VICTIM BE?

  33. avid follower @ October 11, 2011 at 4:04 pm
    Eagle Parent,

    how ironic you are more concerned about who is next victim will be. i bet as long as it is not an ESD student, you will be fine with it.

  34. Lisa @ October 11, 2011 at 5:23 pm
    It’s charming that eagleparent now worries about Campbells next “victim”. Throughout the trial ESD supporters never considered Jane to be a “victim”. There certainly was no concern for victims then- only criticism,blame, and labeling.
    As for ESD “trying to do the right thing” – what vain imagination!

  35. Former Student @ October 11, 2011 at 5:57 pm
    Vain imagination also seems to come from many people completely unrelated to ESD who were not there too see everything first hand. Including a D Magazine article which got basic facts about ESD’s campus incorrect. People that were there are probably not as imaginative as a lot of the anonymous bloggers who have no sense of the back story behind all of this. Telling ESD people to “get over it” seems hypocritical if you can’t get over the fact that the family very obviously cared about money more than the actual victimization of their daughter by Campbell.

    And as for the article that mentioned that the Doe family was dossapointed he didn’t serve hail time – that article took that quote from Aldous. It’s funny that Aldous says they were disappointed in just one article while two other news sources (PHP and Dallas Morning News) both got the information – all factual – that the Does had a say in Campbell not going to jail.

  36. Eagle Parent @ October 11, 2011 at 6:24 pm
    @avid follower and @lisa- I am so offended by your comments. Throughout the trial I felt for Jane Doe. If I had been her parent I would have taken her out of the ESD immediately. If you had been following anything that I have said on this blog you would know that. I hope that Jane gets the therapy that she will need to be as complete as person as she can be in her life. I wish her well. I have known her since she was 5.

    Nathan Campbell’s next victim is who I feel sorry for now. Why? Because there will be a young woman who, because this family (in my opinion) cared more about getting money from MY school instead of putting a sexual predator away in jail.

    I wish all the professional bloggers would just get off of this and let the people who really know the family, the school, and Nathan Campbell do the blogging.

  37. Mothe of Alum @ October 11, 2011 at 8:09 pm
    I can see it now…a war of yard signs. “THIS IS OUR HOUSE” vs
    “Time to clean “OUR HOUSE”

  38. alex @ October 11, 2011 at 10:15 pm
    I doubt very much there will be a “next victim” as there has yet to be a first “victim” this side of the American judicial system. Jane Doe is no victim in this…and “therapy” is the last thing she’ll ever need. Those who truly know her know this and were prevented from testifying at the civil trial. Her parents are to blame fo failing to monitor their teenage daughters whereabouts…parking lots at midnight..?? hotel rooms when she was supposedly at a “friends” house..?? (ever think of calling the parents of these “friends” to see how your daughter was doing)..?? looking for someone to blame then Jane’s parents need to find a mirror.

  39. Trial watcher3 @ October 11, 2011 at 11:00 pm
    @alex – no doubt jd2 was troubled and probably very obnoxious! As one mom wrote in PHP, ESD is a faith-based community. So, do people of faith discard the troubled? it’s easy to bring food to the sick, but having empathy for a troubled, teenage abuse victim is much more difficult! Did you learn the story of Jesus, the Pharisee, and the sinful woman in chapel? ESD leadership could have shown some compassion….and you could learn about empathy.

    As for the parents, I am sure they have suffered for their lack of vigilance more than you will ever know.

  40. Lisa @ October 12, 2011 at 8:36 am
    LOL, @eagleparent. I don’t doubt you wish everyone but ESD people not post on this blog!
    But you cannot dismiss and exclude outsiders from a newspaper blog like you do in your community. There is a big world outside your tall walls. ” Other people ” live in it and are free to express views that do not reflect your values or lack of them. Deal with it.

  41. boooo @ October 12, 2011 at 11:40 am
    the does did win but they aren’t going to get any money anytime soon. esd is appealing and i highly doubt any money will be given to the does. by not wanting campbell to go to jail the does are screwed now. its all about the money.

  42. Nancy @ October 12, 2011 at 1:36 pm
    Lisa, if you are not ESD people then who are you? I know why “ESD people” are blogging here but why are you here?

    Do you really think that your nasty posts are changing anyone’s mind? Do you think if you are a pain long enough that the Does will get a check or fire anyone?

    It is not going to happen. All your hate, greed and lies will just make the ESD community stronger and closer.

    Maybe you are not up on current events but the the Does cut a deal with Campbell to let him off. They proved they were all about the money. OK. No one is buying your “victim” act any more. Time for another fake protest! LOL Maybe you can fly those SNAP folks in again.

  43. former esd student @ October 12, 2011 at 4:05 pm
    Nancy: STOP. PLEASE. You sound so juvenile it defies description. Literally, you remind me of a middle school girl (no that’s not fair to middle school girls).

    Do you actually believe your nasty posts will change anyone’s mind? NO. Do you believe that if you whine long enough on here that the verdict will change? NO.

    Frankly your comments are so outrageous that I sometimes wonder if you yourself don’t believe them and are just writing them for your own amusement. Which is fine. This is a blog, but if you care about ESD please stop. The absurdity of your posts renders them and you not believable.

  44. Nancy @ October 12, 2011 at 4:57 pm
    “STOP PLEASE”? LOL. you sound pretty juvenile yourself (so called) former esd student. Grow up. I don’t speak for ESD.
    You don’t like my posts skip them.

  45. Go Nancy @ October 12, 2011 at 7:11 pm
    Actually, I encourage Nancy to continue posting. Her comments will live here on the internet forever and will be seen by ESDs prospective parents when researching the school. They should know what sort of vile people they’ll be involved with for the next dozen years should they choose to send their child to ESD.

    This whole mess must make the blood boil of those parents whose kids didnt get into St. Marks or Hockaday and who thought they found a good alternative to those incredible schools. A few spots each year do open up at St. Marks and Hockaday, so all is not lost, ESD parents…

  46. Avid Reader @ October 13, 2011 at 8:25 am
    There is no reason to vilify Nancy. We can all post whatever we want and Nancy’s are going to do more to put the much needed changes at ESD in motion.

  47. FomerESD DadX2 @ October 13, 2011 at 9:16 am
    Sure lot’s of cattiness on display here lately – lol. So much for substance…

    No jail time for Campbell – let the excuses begin. Res ipsa loquitur.

  48. @formeresddadx2 @ October 13, 2011 at 10:04 pm
    @omerESD DadX2 @ October 13, 2011 at 9:16 am
    Excuses by bloggers? You actually care? The only jury that has heard the case has spoken. You want to hear another one? Awesome, it will cost you 1-2 million to find out. And that is the gamble 1-2 million to save ESD how much of the 9.2 million verdict.
    The lot’s for lots and lol tells me Nancy.

    “Sure lot’s of cattiness on display here lately – lol. So much for substance…No jail time for Campbell – let the excuses begin. Res ipsa loquitur.”

  49. NotSoFinalJudgment @ October 14, 2011 at 4:52 pm
    No one really “wins” anything in this situation. What happened was awful, and can never be undone. Did ESD make mistakes? A jury decided they did, but ESD will most likely appeal. So, the civil case moves on up the appellate court ladder.

    I don’t understand why jail time wasn’t given in this criminal portion of this matter.

    I don’t understand why the victim and the family of the victim didn’t pressure the prosecutors to give jail time; based on what has been written in the press, it doesn’t seem as though they asked for jail time, despite Jane Doe calling Nathan Campbell “twisted” and “manipulative” after he was sentenced…to not even one day in jail; probation.

    I’d want the “twisted,” “manipulative” man who took my virginity by rape to see the inside of a prison (for quite some time). If it is a fact that the Does (all of them; mother father and daughter) didn’t really want, didn’t demand jail time for Nathan Campbell, then it really makes me wonder why. Why would they pursue this case so vigorously in civil court but not in criminal court? From Jane’s quotes in the article above, I doubt she, or her family have forgiven Nathan Campbell for what he did (they certainly didn’t forgive ESD).

    I don’t judge the family for suing ESD; that was their right. But, I do question why they didn’t demand that Campbell rot in jail for a while–didn’t he do something heinous enough to Jane (and her family) that he should be punished harshly? Didn’t he put them through a terrible, life-changing ordeal? 10 years of “community supervision” and being forced to register as a sex offender doesn’t seem nearly harsh enough punishment.

    I can’t imagine that the community will be enhanced, or in any way safer by Nathan Campbell’s restricted/monitored presence in it for the next 10 years after having spent no time confined for the sexual abuse he admitted to perpetrating.

    It seems as though the civil case against the big, wealthy institution was pursued with great vigor and energy, yet the criminal case against the person ultimately culpable of raping a 16 year old girl was not given the same vigor and energy. Yes, Campbell plead guilty, and admitted to his crime; but should that be rewarded with a more lenient sentence? In this case, it doesn’t seem appropriate or just.

    ESD has to pay? Yeah, I think they probably should; it doesn’t sound like they handled any of this very well, and that’s very disappointing. Everyone makes mistakes, and those mistakes have consequences. But money doesn’t give Jane Doe, or her family, their lives back; it doesn’t put them back to where they were before all of this happened. Neither would jail time for Nathan Campbell, but, at least he would experience some very harsh consequences for his heinous criminal conduct–proportionately harsh when compared with the civil jury verdict levied against ESD.

    I can’t imagine it will be easy for “The Does” to remain in Dallas, and I doubt they will; they’re anonymous only to people who don’t know them. The problem now is that they’ll have to wait it out here for another 1-3 years while the multimillion-dollar judgment (designed by our system to make them as whole as possible for their injuries) most likely goes up on appeal.

    At the end of the day, for being raped by a teacher, and for ultimately being forced to leave her school because of it, the largest form of “justice” Jane Doe and her family gets is a $9.2 Million judgment (subject to appeal).

    For that non-final judgment, she and her family had to give up their privacy, many of their friends and acquaintances, and ultimately their lives as they knew them–and pursuit of civil justice is likely still far from over. Meanwhile the related criminal case is over and her rapist will spend zero days in jail for his crime; today he is relatively free to walk among us.

    Sure, he’s marked for the rest of the days he walks the Earth, but so is Jane, and so is her family. Nathan Campbell will always be that teacher from ESD who raped Jane Doe, but Jane Doe will always be the girl whose rapist didn’t spend a day in jail for what he did to her. At least money can pay for therapy; I can think of a family who is going to need a lifetime of it.

    Justice served?

  50. Avid Reader @ October 14, 2011 at 9:47 pm
    Campbell owned up to his heinous crime and I agree that I also do not feel that full justice was not served in his sentencing. What I do not feel is any desire or reason to bash a rape victim for any choice they make in this situation. ESD has still yet to own up to any of their mistakes* and their sentence was just. That said, the administration/board’s (NOT the students and teachers) statements seem to show that they will try to continue down the same path as before-desperately trying to sweep their massive failings out of public view. ESD could pay the full $9.2M (it should actually be much less and it will probably drop on appeal IMO), $1M, $100K, or $100M, but justice will not be served until they clean house in the administration to get ESD back on track. Swann should be gone; as should Mayo and Royall. Burrow should have been fired years ago, but since he has some evidence that ESD asked him to reach out to Campbell to cover, he is just on administrative leave or some other silly term designed to be vague. And yes, I can neither confirm nor deny that ESD asked Burrow, but it sure makes sense.

    *Apparently ESD thinks that John Eagle apologizing on the stand twice about how the situation was handled and then turning around an hour later and putting out a statement saying that they stand fully behind how the administration handled the situation is somehow a legitimate apology.

  51. Homeschool Mom @ October 17, 2011 at 9:45 am
    Okay I’ll ask this another way

    Did Jane come back from her faraway college to testify?

  52. Claire St. Amant @ October 17, 2011 at 9:46 am
    @Homeschool Mom, Yes, she did.

Leave a Reply