Comments on: Aldous Says Jail Time Required Criminal Trial

By: The Darling

The Darling — Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:16:07 +0000

Thrilled this is in the light. I stupidly dropped the charges when I was attacked. In high school I didn’t want to relive the drama. Just wanted to bury it asap.

Hopefully this girl isn’t too screwed up. My coping methods weren’t the best. Tried to OWN my sexuality by using it to make men weak. At 18, I was homewrecking, then graduated to gold digger.

By: Avid Reader

Avid Reader — Tue, 18 Oct 2011 21:44:40 +0000

And Nancy does not disappoint, always good for some entertainment.

“Unless it is some legal dictionary.”

LOL. Yes, they were using the “legal dictionary” otherwise known as the “law”.

By: AuntieCairo

AuntieCairo — Tue, 18 Oct 2011 20:47:23 +0000

Former ESD Mother – P/I attorneys hire PR firm as do most parties in high profile cases. I do understand the concept of lawsuits — and having served on juries it’s very complicated when arriving at jury awards. If as you say the Does are only interested in holding ESD accountable and working towards change, and not making alot of money off of a tragic situation, then I assume they will donate whatever money they get to a rape crisis or child abuse charitable organization and pay it all forward.

By: Nancy

Nancy — Tue, 18 Oct 2011 20:36:59 +0000

Is there any limit to the number of fake names one can have on this blog? Just Curious?

Dearest Justcurious@, there is never a reason for hate. I can’t make you hate. If you are filled with hate then it is because you choose to have hate in your heart. You can’t blame others for that. I do feel bad for you though as all that hate is just going to eat you up. I also wonder why you have so much hate for me and ESD and seemingly none for Campbell. You don’t seem upset in the slightest about him not doing jail time. I find that odd.

As you know, but we can go over again, Jane was 16 years old and week before her 17 birthday. I don’t call that a child. (FYI, most young women have sex around this age.)

Jane was old enough to know the difference between right and wrong and she knew what she did was wrong because she lied to cover it up. Which, BTW, I think was plenty reason enough to expel her.

I have never demonized Jane. Campbell is at fault but the legal definition of rape or what YOU are calling rape is not the true definition of rape. At least that is not what it is in any dictionary, Unless it is some legal dictionary. Rape is without consent with force or the threat of it. That didn’t happen here but that doesn’t make Jane a demon. IMO.

The jury found the school was not responsible for the sex just for the way they handled a situation that was not of their making. ESD got stuck with the worst judge in Dallas County. I think the School will win an appeal. I also hope they consider suing the Does and Campbell. Why should the people really responsible (for the rape of a child as you call it) get off light?

By: Student

Student — Tue, 18 Oct 2011 19:40:06 +0000

Who is the girl thats what i want to know. She must have been incredibly beautiful for him to put everything on the line. Story was tantalizing but time for the juicy stories to leak…

By: Tired Head

Tired Head — Tue, 18 Oct 2011 19:28:36 +0000

@Justcurious/amanda – Many (most?) of us familiar with the Does, ESD, and the whole story will just never accept Jane Doe as a “rape victim” whatever the current Texas statutes may say. I’m pretty sure she knew what she was doing was wrong. Nevertheless, Campbell deserved much worse than he got, but one can’t help but think that if JD was truly the victim of repeated rape the family would have pushed for some sort of jail time. Spin it all you want, but this just doesn’t compute.

By: amanda

amanda — Tue, 18 Oct 2011 16:30:04 +0000

It’s kind of sad that Nancy is having such a great time at the expense of a rape victim.

By: Avid Reader

Avid Reader — Tue, 18 Oct 2011 15:57:46 +0000

I forget, did the Doe’s rob the school or did a jury find ESD liable and award the Does $9.2M? LOL. I think the award will drop considerably in the appeal, as it should. It makes me happy to see Nance predicting that “they never see a dime” because if you recall, she was continuously predicting that the initial case would go ESD’s way.

By: Justcurious

Justcurious — Tue, 18 Oct 2011 11:41:50 +0000

Dearest Nancy – The reason for the hate is when you – a supposed adult, blasts what was a child at the time of the offense; and demonize her for being RAPED. Simple and sad.

Sorry the money judgement has got you in a tissy.

[REDACTED]. Something definitely is not right with you however I respect your right to blog away.

By: Nancy

Nancy — Tue, 18 Oct 2011 00:33:27 +0000

Well yes, Avid Doe follower, I AM having fun! After weeks of hearing how bad the school was and what victims the Does were and now to see that I have been proven right, that they have proven they are all about the money, yeah, I am having a great time watching you and your buddies try to spin the latest.

But hey, why do you guys have to be so nasty? I don’t call you all names and try to run you all off. Why is it that anyone that doesn’t agree with the plaintiff’s story has to be run off and attacked. What are you so afraid of?

I am kind of wondering what all Charla told the Does. What did she tell them? That they could escape all blame, rob the school and let Campbell off? That they could cash in on Campbell’s mistake? Walk away rich and keep their name out of it? I am so glad the world doesn’t work that way. What have they gotten for all their greed?

I will make a prediction that they never see a dime. Also that all of the people on this blog defending the Does have a really slim Christmas. The check is not coming.