Comments on: Plaintiffs in ESD Case Allege Witness Tampering, Perjury

By: Anxious Spectator

Anxious Spectator — Thu, 10 Nov 2011 21:14:01 +0000

Claire, any updates on the hearing from today?

By: Avid Reader

Avid Reader — Thu, 10 Nov 2011 16:09:18 +0000

Thanks for the clarification Interested Observer. Whether it is reading comprehension or something else; the motion is only 42 pages with the remaining pages being supporting text from previous filings and discovery.

By: Avid Reader

Avid Reader — Wed, 09 Nov 2011 22:18:19 +0000

I guess Nance’s PR retainer from ESD has run out.

By: Interested observer

Interested observer — Wed, 09 Nov 2011 18:30:38 +0000

Avid Reader, @interested observer. Please note that my comments were an attribution of an attitude by someone who commits overkill. Clearly, in context, they were not a threat directed toward anyone. The overkill is the apparent motive of being “out for blood,” and to “bury” the opposition. It is reflected in actions by one who has alrady won, and still hasn’t gotten enough.

There is no problem with my reading comprehension. I said the motion was 80+ pages. Actually, with exhibits and everything else, it is 327 pages. That’s overkill. The motion is online at dallascounty.org.

By: @interested observer

@interested observer — Tue, 08 Nov 2011 20:17:24 +0000

40 pages and not 80, reading comp. much?
I think Aldous should find out who you are and what these “blood” and “bury” threats are for. Shouldn’t be too hard to find out.

By: really

really — Sat, 05 Nov 2011 16:56:16 +0000

this is a new twist.

By: Avid Reader

Avid Reader — Fri, 04 Nov 2011 20:39:43 +0000

@interested observer, Who are you threatening with your “it’s about blood” and “We will bury you.” comments?

By: Avid Reader

Avid Reader — Fri, 04 Nov 2011 20:38:13 +0000

Wow. The Burrow’s hide and seek sections are ridiculous. So, is ignoring court orders like Castaneda did in the Burrow supoena (not to mention the general disregard for the witness/discovery protocols) a common occurrence by lawyers?

By: interested observer

interested observer — Fri, 04 Nov 2011 20:18:47 +0000

Sounds like a catfight to me. Do we need this? Talk about cluttering up the court’s record. 80 plus pages just to file a motion for sanctions? Geez, that’s overkill. Take a rifle shot instead of a scattergun approach and be done with it. Methinks thou protests too much. Maybe she got a burr under her saddle because sanctions were threatened from the other side. Now, it’s about blood. We will bury you.

By: Claire St. Amant

Claire St. Amant — Fri, 04 Nov 2011 17:31:18 +0000

@amanda, It’s my understanding the DA would investigate perjury/witness tampering charges.

@Just an observer, Could be. It would stand to reason that if an attorney/team of attorneys is found to have committed crimes, its case for appeal would weaken.